Dear all, Thank you for the great tips!
All the best, Paul -- Paul Rigor http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jun Zhao <jun.z...@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > In my experience, most concurrent triple stores perform fairly comparably > well for queries. However, if you do plan to load a huge amount of RDF data > into your triple, say more than 10 million, then I would suggest you get a > powerful computer first. > > A 64-bit computer with >15GB memory should give you some reasonable > performance. And you can also play with some disk partition. > > I wrote some notes a while back, benchmarked on Jena TDB: > > http://code.google.com/p/open-biomed/wiki/BenchmarkLoadingFlyBaseEC2XLarge > > Hope it can be helpful to you. > > cheers, > > Jun > > > On 14/06/11 16:05, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> There was a paper comparing query performance presented at SWAT4LS in >> Berlin 2010 by Vladimir Mironov (CC'd). >> >> Within HCLS, many triplestores have been used. It depends on the purpose >> and your preferences for features. The HCLS KB is in Virtuoso and >> Allegrograph. We've also worked with Sesame and OWLIM. NCBO uses Mulgara >> for their SPARQL endpoint. The nice thing about many of the triplestores >> is that if you decide to use another one, migrating your data isn't much >> work so you're not locked in. >> >> Cheers, >> Scott >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Michael Miller >> <michael.mil...@systemsbiology.org >> <mailto:michael.mil...@systemsbiology.org>> wrote: >> >> hi paul, >> >> i did a little research on this a little while ago. you should have >> plenty of power. >> >> if you're research i hear oracle offers their spatial triple store >> for free, running jena on top of a storage system like BigOWLIMis >> also quite popular >> >> check out Berlin SPARQL benchmark >> ( >> http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/V5/index.html >> ) >> >> cheers, >> >> michael >> >> *From:*public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org >> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org> >> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org >> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *Paul >> Rigor >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:03 AM >> *To:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto: >> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >> >> *Subject:* triple store recommendation >> >> Hi all, >> >> It was fun joining the conference call yesterday; very enlightening. >> >> I'm looking into setting up my own triplestore (for the first >> time!). I was wondering if you'd have recommendations on which >> storage backend I could use. I'll be deploying the triplestore on an >> okay machine (quad intel xeon X5570 with 48GB, 400GB on striped SAS >> disks). >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> -- >> >> Paul Rigor >> >> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor <http://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Eprigor> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls >> http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall >> >> > >
