lifesci, Recognizing that the "to RDF" space is rather expansive, I'd like to note a few (more) pointers:
https://github.com/timrdf/csv2rdf4lod-automation/wiki/Krextor * an XML-> RDF tool that should be included in such lists. http://static.lod2.eu/Deliverables/deliverable-3.1.1.pdf * A "recent" survey of tools and characteristics (though, the characteristics focus on _how_, not _how well_). https://github.com/timrdf/csv2rdf4lod-automation/wiki/Alternative-Tabular-to-RDF-converters * YA round up https://github.com/timrdf/csv2rdf4lod-automation/wiki/Alternative-XML-to-RDF-converters * YA round up Regards, Tim Lebo On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:03 PM, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > Thanks for the tip David. > > The permanent URL will come when we've created the W3 note. :) The current > projected timeline is to convert to HTML in December and request comments > before then (comments are already welcome). > > Thanks, > Scott > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Booth <da...@dbooth.org> wrote: > Regarding > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2011Nov/att-0013/EPMLSDtoRDF-Revision-V12-for-practice-note_Mikel.doc > > Nice work! Another tool for converting between XML and RDF that should > be mentioned is Gloze: > http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.88.8929&rep=rep1&type=pdf > Gloze was developed by Steve Battle as part of the Jena project, and is > available from the Jena site: > http://openjena.org/contrib/contributions.html > > BTW, does this "Mapping and linking life sciences data using RDF" > document have any more permanent URL yet? > > Thanks, > David > > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:13 -0500, Richard Boyce wrote: > > FYI for LODD folks working on the RDF practice note. --R > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: > > Mikel W3C note > > Date: > > Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:19:53 -0500 > > From: > > Mikel Egaña Aranguren > > <mikel.egana.arangu...@gmail.com> > > To: > > Boyce, Richard David > > <rd...@pitt.edu> > > CC: > > M. Scott Marshall > > <mscottmarsh...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Hi; > > > > Find attached a new version. > > > > I have added one of the tools in the first question and I have created > > a new question for the rest of the tools. The rationale for this is > > that, reading the first question, it seems to me that the emphasis > > goes in RDB2RDF tools, and the tools for non-RDB2RDF seem like > > secondary. If we like this new question I can refactor the document > > (Rest of questions and table) after tomorrow's meeting. Also, I have > > added a citation to Mendeley LODD marked as Yeganeh 2011 in the > > document. Richard, I hope you can add it. > > > > I have also extended and rewritten Q13 and made small changes in some > > places to improve consistency and readability. > > > > Regards > > > > Mikel > > > > PS: tomorrow call is at 17:00 CET? > > > > -- > > Mikel Egaña Aranguren, Ph.D. > > > > http://mikeleganaaranguren.com > > > > > > > > -- > David Booth, Ph.D. > http://dbooth.org/ > > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily > reflect those of his employer. > > > > > > -- > M. Scott Marshall > http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall >