Excellent remarks, David!

Scott, your draft has coming along very nicely, and I believe it will help 
creating additional excitement among the linked data community. With a couple 
of compelling use cases we will be able to convince the skeptics that this is 
the road to go.

Erich

-----Original Message-----
From: David Booth [mailto:da...@dbooth.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:17 PM
To: M. Scott Marshall
Cc: HCLS; biohackat...@googlegroups.com; 
linkedlifedatapracticesn...@googlegroups.com; public-...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: HCLS IG Note on mapping and publishing life sciences RDF

On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 21:16 +0100, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
[ . . . ]
> IG Note (Draft) HCLS IG Note on mapping and publishing life sciences 
> RDF [1] 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XzdsjCfPylcyOoNtDfAgz15HwRdCD-0e0i
> xh21_U0y0/edit?hl=en_US

Nice work on this!  A couple of small editorial suggestions:

1. AFAICT the phrases "a posteriori" and "a priori" are being misused to mean 
"afterward" and "beforehand".  These terms actually mean:

http://www.onelook.com/?w=a+posteriori&ls=a
a posteriori: "involving reasoning from facts or particulars to general 
principals or from effects to causes ("A posteriori demonstration")'

http://www.onelook.com/?w=a+priori&ls=a
a priori: 'involving deductive reasoning from a general principle to a 
necessary effect; not supported by fact ("An a priori judgment")'


2. The intro mentions that "a query for Homo sapiens gene label "Alg2"
in Entrez Gene (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) returns multiple results. 
Among them is one gene located in chromosome 5 (Entrez
ID:85365) and the other in chromosome 9 (Entrez ID:313231), each with multiple 
aliases".  But the results that I see show ID:85365 as the ID for the one on 
chromosome 9, and the other one (maybe?) has ID 10016:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?term=Alg2[sym]%20homo%20sapiens


Thanks!


--
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily 
reflect those of his employer.


Reply via email to