On 03/20/2013 06:15 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
To me, that seems to lead us back to the earlier discussion
(rathole?) about owl:sameAs
Yes, we can model what we are doing at an arbitrary level of
sophistication, but no, we may not want to.
I tend to a view that there are diminishing returns in terms of
levels of indirection here!
+1
This is part of the reason why, IMO, it is folly to judge RDF data in
terms of absolute truth. The more relevant criterion is *usefulness*.
And that depends on the application: crude, simple data may be very
useful for many applications, even if it is useless to others because it
is "incorrect" (according to some notion of "incorrect").
David
