On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:08 PM, David Booth <da...@dbooth.org> wrote:
> > But FYI, the reason Cecil presented his ontology was to allow us to > compare and contrast the various approaches that different individuals have > taken toward developing a FHIR ontology. (Others were presented > previously.) The joint HL7-W3C group on RDF for Semantic Interoperability > http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=RDF_for_Semantic_Interoperability > is working to converge on an ontology that could be adopted as a standard > by the HL7 FHIR work group. As such, it is only an input to our process > rather than a final result (though Cecil may well use it himself as > currently is). > > Thanks for the clarification David. Did I miss links to other ontology examples? If so could you re-post them or put them on the wiki page? Thanks, Tim ============================================ Timothy Cook LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org