FYI. I just noticed that this never got forwarded to the HCLS and ITS
lists.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: health.schema.org Extension
Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:28:37 +0000
Resent-From: public-sche...@w3.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:27:46 +0200
From: Marc Twagirumukiza <twam...@gmail.com>
To: public-sche...@w3.org, W3C Web Schemas Task Force
<public-voc...@w3.org>
CC: jos.de...@agfa.com, Dirk Colaert <dirk.cola...@agfa.com>,
els.l...@agfa.com
Hi Colleagues,
Hi Dan Brickley,
Here are some preliminary informations to start the health.schema.org
<http://health.schema.org> Extension.
1) The name: health.schema.org <http://health.schema.org> (See votes
communicated earlier)
2) The short overview of the extension: See
https://github.com/twamarc/ScheMed/issues/1)
"
The medical extension refines and improves schema.org
<http://schema.org>'s medical/healthcare vocabulary that was initially
published in 2012 (see
http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/health-and-medical-vocabulary-for.htmlhttp://schema.org/docs/meddocs.html
).
Taking into various integration points post-2012 changes (e.g. Audience,
action / muscleAction, Enumeration), and with community effort to extend
and polish existing version (e.g adding other concepts like the Medical
Encounter, Medical Procedure, Health, Health Insurance, Genetics ), it
moves the existing schema.org <http://schema.org>'s medical vocabulary
into a dedicated extension called 'health.schema.org
<http://health.schema.org>.
"
3)Technical work of revisiting the draft in #11
<https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/11> and re-structuring: ONGOING
PLANNED:
4) The list of terms that are moved (todo: list).
5) The list of terms that are renamed (todo: list) with the core.
6) The list of terms that are renamed (todo: list) and moved into the
extension.
7) The list of terms that are created (todo: list) within the core.
8) The list of terms that are created (todo: list) within the extension.
9) The list of terms that are somewhat medically-related terms but
remain in the core (todo: list, e.g. http://schema.org/Recipe).
10)The list of extension-related discussions that are noted as relevant
(todo: list, e.g. GS1, nutrition/food, ...).
11) The list of terms that are related standards groups that have been
identified and invited to comment. (todo: list).
+
12)Coordinate with Food type (help further with foodWarning and
recipeIngredient) #458
Regards,
Marc
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Marc Twagirumukiza* <twam...@gmail.com <mailto:twam...@gmail.com>>
Date: 27 May 2015 at 10:26
Subject: Re: [ScheMed] Re: A way forward for our medicalEntinty
Extension proposal to schema.org <http://schema.org>
To: sche...@googlegroups.com <mailto:sche...@googlegroups.com>
Hi all,
Please find here the Vote results for the short name for medicalEntinty
Extension proposal.
At closing date today, you voted for:
health.schema.org <http://health.schema.org>
Follow this link for details:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1FwakA7Z6AD27A-w8NignT87h42myXUEEtxRBTeQkEeI/viewanalytics
I will follow the next steps with schema.org <http://schema.org> and
keep you all posted.
Regards
Marc
On 19 May 2015 at 19:26, Dave F.D. <jusprav2...@gmail.com
<mailto:jusprav2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Marc,
I think this is the way forward. I support this. But as you said I
moved to Zurich (no longer with ICD11 team) and I will no longer be
able to contribute. However I will ask some fellow from ICD 11 to
get involved. As I said last year am quite sure that this vocab will
be picked up by several colleagues who was looking for a pillar
opensource medical vocab mainly to help interoperability.
2 things we left pending was to deal with data types and to map to
snomed concepts. Any progress there?
Am curious to see the response to Rob about FHIR Ontology.
About the short name I think we should avoid *med.schema.org
<http://med.schema.org>* and use *health.schema.org
<http://health.schema.org> * as a short name for */healthcare. /*The
medical naming would prevent people to extend the vocab in coming
future and would pull out some predicates not really medical but
used in healthcare domain. Here I think Dan Brickley can also advise
as the term may interfere with others extension names. I guess they
have already an hypothetical list of expected extensions : bib. /
auto. / music. / health. / gov. / time. / biz. etc
Keep me posted (but sorry if I do not answer immediately!)
Cheers
Dave
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 16:41:17 UTC+2, Marc wrote:
Hi all,
You should have read this topic about the way forward for our
submitted proposal.
https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/492
I would have your feedback to this.
Personally I support the approach as given the proposal is quite
extensive and specific for medical domain.
Maybe you will find this discussions about extension mechanism
also interesting: http://schema.org/docs/extension.html
PS: Rob and Dave , I know you moved from initial
positions/company. Are you still willing to contribute? If no,
can you forward this to a colleague or recommend one in your
previous positions/company?
Best Regards,
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Schema - Medical Ontology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to schemed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:schemed+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To post to this group, send email to sche...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:sche...@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/schemed.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/schemed/5c8c27ea-e9c3-47ab-9741-ed51c0d9e229%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/schemed/5c8c27ea-e9c3-47ab-9741-ed51c0d9e229%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.