Damian Steer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 22 Aug 2008, at 04:02, Paul Tyson wrote: > >> >> XProc [1] is in Last Call, and as it stands has no built-ins for RDF >> processing. Do any in the community agree with me that having some >> standard pipeline facilities for RDF processing would be a good thing? > > Given the situation, and what others have said, the only thing I'd > like is a way to construct query strings, which would make sparql > nicer to work with. To explain, currently it seems like you'd do: > > <p:document href="http://example.com/rq? > query=.............encoded.noise............."/> > > Which is entirely functional, but not very readable. Any chance of: > > <p:document href="http://example.com/rq";> > <param name="query"> > SELECT * WHERE .... > </param> > </p:document>
No, but this seems perfectly straightfoward: <p:sparql href="http://example.com/rq";> <p:param name="query"> ... </p:param> </p:sparql> Actually, I'd probably try to make the query parameter an option. If someone could propose a practical signature for a SPARQL step, I'd like to see it. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | When a book and a head collide and http://nwalsh.com/ | there is a hollow sound, is it always | the book?-- Lichtenberg
pgpNyH0rH2v5l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
