Hi Samuel,
It's probably the same thing as the other time. The data has the label
as a typed literal with datatype xsd:string -- in SPARQL this is
represented lexically as:
"bifinhos com cogumelos"^^xsd:string
If you change your query to that, I expect you'd get results with both
protege and jena. What's happening apparently here is that Jena is
adhering to the precise semantics of SPARQL while protege is being a bit
lax.
Lee
Samuel Pedro wrote:
I'm trying to know witch class have that label, and again with protege i
have the right result and with jena i'm not.
I'm missing any other Prefix?
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
SELECT ?class
WHERE { ?class rdf:type owl:Class .
?class rdfs:label "bifinhos com cogumelos" }
the class that have that label is this
<owl:Class rdf:about="#BifinhosComCogumelos">
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="#Ovo"/>
<owl:onProperty>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="#hasIngredient"/>
</owl:onProperty>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:someValuesFrom>
<owl:Class rdf:about="#Alface"/>
</owl:someValuesFrom>
<owl:onProperty>
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="#hasIngredient"/>
</owl:onProperty>
</owl:Restriction>
</rdfs:subClassOf>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#PratosdeCarne"/>
<rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";
>bifinhos com cogumelos</rdfs:label>
</owl:Class>
Any ideias of whats wrong this time? Is there another way of do this query?
