On 2010-3-8 18:43 , Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:41 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: > [...] >> Which unnecessarily complicates the structure. > > OK, those examples help. > > This sort of generality is less helpful: > >> There is another issue. There is already deployed RDFa out there. Quite >> a lot, actually. > > If you could give a few examples, that would make the case much > more strongly. > >> As a consequence, there is a strong requirement of >> backward compatibility in the RDFa WG charter. This also means that if >> the @rev is removed from the core HTML5 document, RDFa will have it >> alongside the RDFa specific attributes like @about or @resource... > > My understanding is that there's just one design that > W3C is working on for RDFa in text/html; it will either have @rev > or it will not. >
The current setup is such that the RDFa+HTML5 document will be in synchrony with RDFa1.1, and the latter has to keep backward compatibility... Ivan > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
