On 2015-10-12 13:53, henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote: <snip>
Anders can you please try to be more positive and constructive about your posts.
I consider it constructive asking prospective members of pre-announced WGs to provide input specifications *before* actually starting in order to not repeat the problems we saw in: http://www.w3.org/2012/webcrypto/webcrypto-next-workshop I believe Ryan Sleevi have said something similar as well.
Is it not obvious here that one can use a Shim, and that older browsers never are retrofittted with newer standards?
IE 11 is Microsoft's most recent browser for their currently largest installed base of Windows. Why does it still require a workaround? Probably because there's limited demand for WebCrypto.
I agree with Tony that this looks very much like trolling, much like many of your posts to the WebID Community Group [1].
My postings in the WebID CG has only been about HTTPS Client Cert Authentication used by WebID-TLS. You need no particular knowledge of linked data and RDF on *that* level. Anyway, as we know, HTTPS Client Certificate Authentication is slowly but surely leaving the browser world (Microsoft "Edge" already removed web-enrollment), so these discussions are only of historical interest. Anders
