Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: BH> As Anne pointed out, we will have this problem fixed in the next BH> version. Does that address your concern?
As I said, I have already seen the next draft in the 'dev' part, so I know it's been fixed (with the whole para rephrased) :). I am just a picky translator who would always notice minor errors and typos in some docs written by other people (and probably make some in my own docs :)). BH> changes are not immediately reflected on BH> http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest because the W3C publication BH> process attempts to find a balance between some level of stability BH> and keeping interested parties up to date through new drafts; I see. Sounds like a reasonable approach. The only thing is, if you ask me (who am I, and why bother yourself with that, but still :)), I would say it's better to _either_ place the last draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest, _or_ not make it public at all until the whole process is completed. Otherwise it seems logically inconsistent: one reads a draft saying "the last working draft" on the W3C website, and almost immediately sees another "very last working draft" in another public part of the W3C website :). BH> On http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html you can read BH> more about this process. Thank you, I will read it carefully. M.K. -- Maksym Kozub (+380 44)424-1792(tel./fax), (+380 67)466-5174(mob.) Translations Interpreting Editing MK881-UANIC http://kozub.in.ua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
