On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:04:18 +0200, Brad Fults <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you just decided not to mention conformance requirements for the
URL at all?
Did you actually read the relevant section?
some implementations support other protocols besides HTTP (that
functionality is not covered
in this specification though)
But nowhere is it made explicit (as far as I could see) which schemes
are actually covered in the specification.
Right, as this is mostly up to implementations for this version.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
