Hi-
Robin Berjon wrote:
Here is a proposal that is intended to satisfy both the brevity nazis,
and those who like meaningful method names. I don't really like them
myself, but I can live with them.
- Document.css()
- Document.cssAll()
- Element.css()
- Element.cssAll()
Same length, but with meaning.
No, no, no. Burn that strawman. I'd much rather have ".match()" and
".matchAll()" (or just about anything else). I have a suspicion that
".css*()" would *really* confuse people into thinking it's a way of
setting CSS style properties, or getting elements by classname, or just
about anything other than a generic selector language.
Again, my suggestion is ".nodeBySelector()" and ".nodelistBySelector()"
(or something like that). ".nodeByMatch()"/".nodelistByMatch()"?
Regards-
-Doug
