On Feb 5, 2007, at 10:18 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:41:10 +0530, Anne van Kesteren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the input from Björn I suppose there's no real need for a
method
that returns a single element node (assuming implementations make
that
optimization). Given that, I propose we rename .getAll() to
.getElementsBySelector() and drop .get() (on both Document and
Element).
One advantage is that it's consistent with the naming people
already use
for custom written functions that have this functionality. In
theory it's
also not harder to type than .getElementsByTagName(). The only
thing that
makes it differ from the other getElementsBy* method(s) is that it
doesn't
return a live NodeList. I don't see that as a major problem.
If there are no strong objections I'll implement this in the
specification.
Not having heard strong objections, and having had support for
getElementsBySelector() that is at least as strong as anything
else, I think (with
my chair's hat) this can be taken as the current resolution of the
naming debate.
Which would also resolve ISSUE-110.
Any objections?
I stated my objection already in my message on this thread from
January 28th.
Regards,
Maciej
