On Tue, 22 May 2007 03:02:08 +0200, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
And the standard W3C license for IDL files would likely make it
impossible to start with them. If we wanted to publish IDL that
implementors could use, we'd have to change the license.
I saw in the list archives that that was something Charles might look
into?
It was looked into and I believe it was decided to not further pursue a
"better" license...
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
