Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Carsten Orthbandt wrote:
Bjoern Hoehrmann schrieb:
Why don't you use less &, <, and ]]> sequences in the content and wrap
it into <x>...</x>?
If my response body is (literal example)
---snip---
ut:7325
ubc:0
---snap---
there's obviously some hesitation to wrap that as
---snip---
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<x>
ut:7325
ubc:0
</x>
---snap---
It would be sufficient to use <x>ut:7325,ubc:0</x>. The massive amount
of overhead generated by the connection setup and request and response
headers hardly compare to those 7 bytes.
Or even
<x ut="7325" ubc="0"/>
, removing the need for a custom parser.
Best regards, Julian
