On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Rotan Hanrahan wrote:


Despite my earlier indication to refrain from further comment, I return because I observe some discussion is taking place.

I propose that the text that introduces an algorithm in the normative section be phrased something like the following (based on an idea suggested in Anne's most recent email to this list):

"The value of the text response entity body MUST be determined by the agent as if it had run the following algorithm:"

This, I believe, provides the necessary clarity and flexibility while providing the necessary formal functional definition.

I think saying "as if" is good for total avoidance of ambiguity. I think just saying "the algorithm is" would be worse than the current language, since it leaves it completely unclear what the conformance requirement is.

Regards,
Maciej


Regards,
---Rotan.

________________________________

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 19/06/2007 21:55
To: Anne van Kesteren
Cc: Rotan Hanrahan; public-webapi@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status of algorithms



* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
How about:

Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps may be implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent.

The problem is not with the conformance section, it is with the specific requirements regarding algorithm use, phrases like "must use this algo-
rithm" if using that particular algorithm is not actually required are
confusing and should be changed. You could simply introduce the specific algorithms with "The algorithm is:" and note in the conformance section that where given, implementations must implement an algorithm producing the same results as that in the specification; that would remove much of
the confusion.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http:// bjoern.hoehrmann.de <http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de/> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http:// www.bjoernsworld.de <http://www.bjoernsworld.de/> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http:// www.websitedev.de/





Reply via email to