On 2007/10/04, at 6:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:20:53 +0200, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
inc.com> wrote:
Well, if we get our act together in the HTTP-WG, hopefully you'll
have a registry to refer to.
Would this registry deal with dangerous methods such as TRACE or
CONNECT that can not be supported in an XMLHttpRequest
implementation? Or would these methods need to be called out in the
XMLHttpRequest specification or something?
"Dangerous" is very much application-specific; what's dangerous to
XHR is completely irrelevant to, for example, a proxy. So, no.
How does this registry help with arbitrary HTTP methods?
Don't think it does.
I would very much like to solve the inconsistencies around HTTP
method support for XMLHttpRequest level 2.
As would I.
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
