On 6/16/08, Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. > > I understand why you might like to edit our feedback, Ian, but your edit > does not, in fact, represent Microsoft's feedback on cross-domain. What you > call "redacting background material" I call "removing principles such that > remaining points might seem unprincipled." The members of the WG (and the > public) are welcome to draw their own conclusions from our statements; I am > NOT willing to have you be the one who draws their conclusions for them. > > As every email software package I'm aware of can handle HTML and text, and > most of them can do an automatic translation between the two of them, I'll > ask you again to not editorialize on Microsoft's motives or actions for the > group. Particularly when you are redacting the very principles at issue.
Could you please provide a text/plain *only* message of the feedback in full for good measure? Thanks -- Michael
