Hi folks,
this is a call for consensus to move the Selectors API [1] to Candidate
Recommendation, following the end of the last call. The disposition of
comments[2] has no formal objections, and I believe all substantive issues
are resolved - the only outstanding one is whether i18n accepts the
proposal that notes about normalisation should be in CSS specs rather than
this one, and in any case that can be resolved editorially since it has no
effect on conformance of implementations.
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/disposition-of-comments.html
As always, silence will be taken as assent, but positive responses are
preferred.
In addition, since this specification has a number of implementations we
may try to have a zero-length CR period (by approving tests and showing
that we have interoperability already) - any comments on that approach are
welcome.
Please provide assent or dissent and any comments by the end of Thursday
12 February.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
