On Apr 7, 2009, at 06:37 , Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Scott Wilson
<scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 Apr 2009, at 15:33, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
You will have this problem regardless of how you solve this issue
if you
do not also require a specific scripting language, markup
language, etc.
It seems to be rather strongly _implied_ that widgets will use HTML,
ECMAScript and CSS...
Could we also similarly imply that the .localStorage API also be
implemented? This is especially easy now that localStorage is becoming
its own spec [1].
Well, my understanding was that we had to have Web Storage for API &
Events anyway since that's what implements preferences (and we need to
define how it's used so that we can get read-only keys). Even if
that's all there is, it'd be a little bit silly for a UA to support
Web Storage for the preferences but not in other contexts.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
