Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au> wrote: > (Also I see that you’re using the “string” and “wstring”, and L"wide > string" values. Are you of the opinion that Web IDL should introduce > those instead of DOMString?)
Shiki Okasaka <sh...@google.com> wrote: > In my opinion, it would be nice if we can use the keyword 'string' as > the same meaning of 'DOMString' in Web IDL since it's not only for DOM > specifications. this would be a serious problem for mozilla. In mozilla, 'string' and 'wstring' mean things very different from DOMString, and we can't change that.
