On May 22, 2009, at 5:30 AM, ext Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 11:17:26 +0200, Scott Wilson
<scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
[About use-cases and requirements for widgets access requests]
Is there a particular preferred format for submitting use cases?
Not that I know of, but I would much prefer to see one thread per
use-case
on this list, so they can be discussed separately, and also
discussed as
separate items in phone conferences.
I think a high priority is to get useful information and as such, I
am willing to take just about anything you can provide.
If by format you mean text vs HTML vs PDF, etc., my preference in
order is HTML, text, PDF.
If by format you mean should we follow the pattern we used in widgets-
reqs [1], or OWL [2], or some other methodology (e.g. [3]), I am
mostly indifferent and again come back to the point of getting useful
info. I don't think you should feel constrained to "shoehorn" your
information into the relatively constrained pattern we used in [1]
nor should you feel obligated to do something comprehensive (e.g.
[3]). Perhaps the OWL pattern is an acceptable middle ground.
BTW, +1 to Arve's suggestion for a separate thread per UC.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#section-use-cases>
[3] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_case#Use_case_templates>
