On Fri, 22 May 2009 20:21:56 +0200, Mark Baker <dist...@acm.org> wrote: > Ah, right, I didn't realize it was related to a discussion Marcos and > I had last year; > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2008OctDec/thread.html#msg50 > > I thought he had (somewhat grudgingly) accepted that way (the use of > relative references) forward, as IIRC, the widget: scheme idea was > dropped about that time. Has some new requirement emerged since then > that makes relative references an undesirable option?
<a>.href is always an absolute URL on getting. Making it something else would be a bad hack and counter to how it has been designed. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
