On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Tyler Close <tyler.cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote:

On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Tyler Close wrote:

    Uniform-Headers = "Uniform-Headers" ":" ( "*" | #field-name )

[...]

Are Apple and/or Firefox interested in implementing the above? Does
mnot or other HTTP WG members consider the above a satisfactory
solution to ISSUE-90?

I'm interested in implementing a feature along these lines if it goes into CORS. If it's UMP-only, then no, and I would object that it violates the
subset relation.

I am also not sure the * value is a good idea. It is tempting in its
convenience but seems likely to cause unintended consequences.

I agree with everything Maciej said.

This time.

Thanks for the quick response time.

If this is a good feature, shouldn't the pressure be on CORS to adopt
it, rather than for UMP to drop it? Otherwise, it might seem politics
are overriding technical virtue.

I didn't mean to exert any pressure on UMP to drop it. Sorry if you
read otherwise into what I said.

Me neither. I don't intend to pressure anyone in particular. I'd like to come to consensus on a solution and ideally add it to both specs.

 - Maciej


Reply via email to