Either sounds fine to me. Please open something in the bug tracker? On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:12 PM, ben turner <bent.mozi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that switching 'noOverwrite' from false to true is confusing. > I definitely vote to rename the parameter to 'overwrite' and and keep > the default as false. > > -Ben > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Shawn Wilsher <sdwi...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Per the current spec [1], noOverwrite defaults to false for put > operations > > on an object store. Ben Turner and I have been discussing changing the > > default of put to not allow overwriting by default. We feel this is > better > > behavior because simply omitting the flag should not result in destroying > > data. Putting my application developer hat on, I'd much rather have to > be > > explicit about destroying existing data instead of having it happen on > > accident. We could also change the parameter to just overwrite and have > it > > default to false. > > > > What is everyone's thoughts on this? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Shawn > > > > > >
