On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> wrote:
> 3) UMP appears to be nearly a subset of CORS, and does have a lot of > nice properties for security and simplicity. We support UMP and would > like to see the syntax continue to be unified with CORS so that it is > in fact a subset (I believe this is already happening). We also > (mostly) support UMP being a separate spec so that web authors can > read it without being bogged down by the additional complexity CORS > offers. If there is a good editorial way to handle this in a single > spec, that would probably be fine. > There turned out to be a good deal of mis-communication around this. My read of the chromium-dev thread and the following public-webapps discussion is that Chromium supports there being a document (call it a spec if you will) for web developers that explains how to use the UMP subset of CORS and is referenced from the CORS spec. Ojan
