On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Arun Ranganathan <aranganat...@mozilla.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@opera.com> >> wrote: > >> > >> > That works for me too, but then please use internally consistent >> > numbering >> > rather than some codes matching DOMException and the new codes not >> > matching >> > DOMException as that is just too confusing, especially going >> > forward. I.e. >> > DOMException might gain a similar exception but it will have a >> > different >> > number, so only for the older numbers it will match, etc. It just >> > does not >> > make much sense. >> >> OK, so we stick with the current interfaces, but try to keep the >> numbers all matching/nonconflicting. Works for me. > > OK, we'll use in-order numbering and not have any kind of dependency on > DOMException.
Sorry, I misread the conclusion. In-order numbering does make more sense. Let me know when you're about to update your numbering, and I'll fix mine to go with them.
