Jonas Sicking: > Unfortunately there is no way to express this in WebIDL, so I think we > need to describe it in prose instead. I'll raise this with Cameron, > but I think that since at this point only IndexedDB uses these > "static" functions, it might not make sense to add support to WebIDL.
I think it makes sense enough to add support for static operations, so I’ve added it: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-operations http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-static-operations http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-operations http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#proddef-Qualifiers -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/