On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Keean Schupke <ke...@fry-it.com> wrote:
> Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to > it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now > and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the moment > looks like i'm moving to using BDB instead of SQLite, (apart from when size > of the app package file is an issue and SQLite is provided as part of the > platform). Regardless, I think your point stands -- the indexes in SQLite no doubt look an awful lot like BDB btrees, which look an awful lot like IDB objectStores. This is a foundational API.