http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9786
Eliot Graff <eliot...@microsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Eliot Graff <eliot...@microsoft.com> 2011-05-24 21:46:05 UTC --- > * none of the interfaces/exceptions are marked with the extended > attribute [NoInterfaceObject] I doubt they are all meant to be visible > in the global namespace These interfaces are marked with [NoInterfaceObject]: IDBEnvironment IDBEnvironmentSync IDBTransactionCallback > * The IDBDatabaseException Interface uses the "attribute" keyword for > "code" and "message" - exceptions don't have attributes, the keyword > should be removed "attribute" keyword removed from both. > * IDBDatabaseSync.createObjectStore uses an extended attribute > "[Null=Null]" on its second parameter - I suspect it was meant to be > "[TreatUndefinedAs=Null]", and if so, the type of the parameter should > be "DOMString?" rather than DOMString Cannot repro. I believe this was removed previously. > Based on the discussions on the list, and as the beginning of 3.3 seems > to allude to, synchronous operations are only going to be used in > Workers; I suggest to state that clearly, and also to start the first > example of the spec with the async example if that's the one that is > most likely to be used. Section 3.3 begins: The synchronous database API methods provide a blocking access pattern to IndexedDB databases. Since they block the calling thread they are only available from workers. The first sample is asynchronous. I believe that this covers all of the requests in this bug. I am going to go ahead and resolve it. Let me know if there's anything else needed for this one. Thanks, Eliot -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.