On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Kenneth Russell <k...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Ian Hickson <i...@hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Kenneth Russell wrote: >>> >>> Jonas's suggestion of adding another argument to postMessage, and >>> Gregg's generalization to declare it as an array of objects to be >>> transferred rather than copied, sounds good. >> >> We could change make MessagePort and ArrayBuffer both inherit from a >> [NoInterfaceObject] empty interface, and then make the MessagePort[] >> argument of the various postMessage() methods instead take an array of >> this new interface, and then just have ArrayBuffer and MessagePort both >> define how to be cloned in this way. >> >> If people like this approach I can work with Kenneth on getting the >> wording right in the various specs. > > This sounds good to me; in the interest of moving things forward, are > there any objections?
No, this sounded good to the people here at mozilla that I talked with about this. / Jonas
