>On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote: >> >>We noticed that section "4.3 Steps for committing a transaction" talks about >>setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to >>"commit". >>Did we intend for the handler to be named "oncommit" or should the event type >>be "complete". >>The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed was >>because it was committed. >>The different terms made the section a little inconsistent. >>Do we want to change any names or keep it as is? >> >>Israel
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote: >I think "complete" should be the correct type string. > > -Ben Turner > If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the change to the spec. Israel
