On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Ian Fette (�~B��~B��~C��~C~U�~B��~C~C�~C~F�~B�) wrote: > > I agree we shouldn't require deflate-stream it in the API. I don't agree > the API should specify an exact set of extensions, as that would prevent > any future versions/developments. A minimum baseline would be reasonable > though, once we have that minimum baseline in place (e.g. a stable set > of extensions that are well tested, such as compression and > multiplexing). I don't think we should put the cart before the horse.
As soon as there's a feature that browsers are to implement, we would update the WebSockets spec to list it as a requirement. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
