On 2011-08-08 11:34, Jonas Sicking wrote:
... First off, that's infinitely more work to support a rarely used feature than not supporting it at all.Second, since that notation isn't used anywhere else, it's a pretty big cost in brain print for users. So no, I wouldn't say it's cheap. ...
Well, it's cheap in that it needs no new API signature and uses a notation that is already well-established.
Best regards, Julian
