I think it's a great idea to get your spec more attention in W3C community specially because some UA vendors don't participate in discussions on whatwg.
- Ryosuke On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Aryeh Gregor <a...@aryeh.name> wrote: > For the last several months, I was working on a new specification, > which I hosted on aryeh.name. Now we've created a new Community Group > at the W3C to host it: > > http://aryeh.name/spec/editing/editing.html > http://www.w3.org/community/editing/ > > Things are still being worked out, but one issue is what mailing list > to use for discussion. I don't want to create new tiny mailing lists > -- I think we should reuse some existing established list where the > stakeholders are already present. Previously I was using the whatwg > list, but as a token of good faith toward the W3C, I'd prefer to > switch to public-webapps, even though my spec is not a WebApps WG > deliverable. (If it ever does move to a REC track spec, though, which > the Community Group process makes easy, it will undoubtedly be in the > WebApps WG.) > > Does anyone object to using this list to discuss the editing spec? >