On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:26:04 +0200, Travis Leithead
<travis.leith...@microsoft.com> wrote:
IE10 does not implement SharedWorkers at the present time. We also don’t
yet implement the updated "Transferrable" notion for MessagePorts in the
structured clone algorithm.
Ah, OK.
We do ship Workers now, and so my primary concern is that the spec
doesn't remove the "ports" property of the MessageEvent.
Yep, I'm not suggesting to remove it.
I don't mind the proposal to re-use .source of MessageEvent for a
"connect" event on a SharedWorker. I think it's a bit ugly to swap the
"WindowProxy" type of .source to "any" just for this case.
Anne said the type could be (WindowProxy or MessagePort)?.
I am curious to see where this latest discussion on perhaps using a
different Event interface for "connect" events will lead...
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
