Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of
the Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the
spec's errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so.
The [Errata] has already been reflected in the [Proposed-PER] (see
[Diff]) and it includes a new title of "Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) -
Packaging and XML Configuration".
Please send all comments regarding this CfC to the public-webapps@w3.org
mail list by August 8 and note silence will be considered as agreement
with the proposal. If you support this CfC, a positive response is
preferred and encouraged.
-Thanks, AB
[PER] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr-edited>
[REC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-widgets-20110927/>
[Errata] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/errata.html>
[Proposed-PER] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/>
[Diff]
<http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A//www.w3.org/TR/widgets/&doc2=http%3A//dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [widgets] Request to publish is P&C as Proposed Edited
Recommendation
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:49:34 +0100
From: ext Marcos Caceres <w...@marcosc.com>
To: <public-webapps@w3.org>
CC: Barstow Arthur <art.bars...@nokia.com>
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 at 12:27, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Earlier this year I corrected a bunch of things in P&C (see [errata]), so I think it would be good
to republish the spec. Also, with the name of the spec still being cited as an "issue", I've
changed the name of the specification to "Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and XML
Configuration". Hopefully that new coat of paint will stick to the bikeshed. I would kindly
request a CFC to republish.
Kind regards,
Marcos
[errata] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/errata.html
