On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> The subject line says Lazy Blob, not Lazy Blob and XHR. For the record, I > will object to a LazyBlob solution that is tied solely to XHR, so deal with > it now rather than later. > Then you better get onto specifying a resource/range transfer protocol on top of websockets alongside with web-server modules/extensions to be able to understand that protocol, because other than that there is no way that you'll get what you want.
