On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglaz...@google.com> wrote: >> Also, I want to know better which part of _putting it on ShadowRoot_ >> strikes Anne as bad. I would like striking him at all, especially with
^^^ would like TO AVOID striking him :) >> something bad :P > > Mainly, if it's bad for DocumentFragment, it's bad for ShadowRoot too. > I think the argument against innerHTML is the old string-based DOM > manipulation is a bad idea. I don't really care strongly either way, > but I do care that if we make a decision for DocumentFragment we apply > it to ShadowRoot too. We should design this platform thingie somewhat > coherently. Still unclear. Are you saying this: if we have API members on ShadowRoot that aren't on DocumentFragment, then ShadowRoot should not be a DocumentFragment? :DG<
