On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Philip Walton <phi...@philipwalton.com>wrote:
> Personally, I had no objection to rel="component". It's similar in > usage to rel="stylesheet" in the fact that it's descriptive of what you're > linking to. > > On the other hand, rel="include" is very broad. It could just as easily > apply to a stylesheet as a Web component, and may limit the usefulness of > the term if/when future rel values are introduced. > > (p.s. I'm new to this list and haven't read through all the previous > discussions on Web components. Feel free to disregard this comment if I'm > rehashing old topics) > > > +1, I like rel="component", document or include doesn't make sense. - E