What about obscured, opaque, invisible, or restricted?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Alan Stearns <stea...@adobe.com> wrote: > On 3/12/13 2:41 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > > >On 3/12/13 5:19 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > >> However, to allow developers a degree of enforcing integrity of their > >> shadow trees, we are going add a new mode, an equivalent of a "KEEP OUT" > >> sign, if you will, which will makes a shadow tree non-traversable, > >> effectively skipping over it in an element's shadow tree stack. > > > >To be clear, what this mode does is turn off the simple way of getting > >the shadow tree. It does not promise that someone can't get at the > >shadow tree via various non-obvious methods, because in practice such > >promises are empty as long as script inside the component runs against > >the web page global. > > > >The question is how to name this. "Hidden" seems to promise too much to > >me. Perhaps "obfuscated"? "Veiled"? > > > >-Boris > > > >P.S. Tempting as it is, "RedWithGreenPolkadots" is probably not an OK > >name for this bikeshed. > > Apologies in advance for adding to the bikeshedding > > protected (mostly private, but you can get around it) > shielded (the shield can be lowered) > gated (the gate can be opened) > fenced (most fences have an opening) > > Or bleenish-grue, if we're going with color names. > > Alan > >