Chaals, Overall, I think we support this proposal but have some questions I would like to get clarifications on:
Maybe I don't recall but is SysApps asking Webapps to take the manifest aspect? Or is this something Webapps thinks is its right because of the prior focus on Widgets packaging? I don't recall case of a group unilaterally taking back something similar to something else it had worked on in the past. If SysApps did approve but in the end disapproved with the result, what recourse would they have? Woudnt it be better to have this as a joint deliverable then? Thanks, Bryan Sullivan -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:29 AM To: public-webapps WG Subject: CfC - working on manifest Hi, at the face to face meeting we agreed to take back the work on a manifest specification for apps, based on the current manifest draft from sysapps [1] that was developed from the proposal [2] included in our charter [3], and to leave the runtime part of the work with Sysapps. This is a formal Call for Consensus on that resolution. Silence will be taken as assent. Responses will be accepted up to the end of the day Tuesday 21 May. for the chairs Chaals [1] http://manifest.sysapps.org/ [2] http: 404 (and people ask me why I care where things get published) [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/webapps/charter/Overview.html -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
