On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Feras Moussa <feras.mou...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> Apologies for the delay, I had broken one of my mail rules and didn't see > this initially. > > Asymeric is correct - there have been a few threads and revisions. A more > up-to-date version is the one Asymeric linked - > http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html > The above version incorporates both promises and streams and is a more > refined version of Streams. > > From other threads on Stream, it became apparent that there were a few > pieces of the current Streams API ED that were designed around older > paradigms and needed refining to be better aligned with current APIs. I > think it does not make sense to have two different specs, and instead have > a combined one that we move forward. > > I can work with Takeshi on getting his version incorporated into the > Streams ED, which we can then move forward with. > I'm happy to. > > Thanks, > Feras > > > > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:32:20 -0400 > > From: art.bars...@nokia.com > > To: vitteayme...@gmail.com; feras.mou...@hotmail.com; > tyosh...@google.com > > CC: public-webapps@w3.org > > Subject: Re: [streams-api] Seeking status and plans > > > > On 10/10/13 6:26 AM, ext Aymeric Vitte wrote: > >> I think the plan should be more here now: > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013OctDec/0049.html > > > > There are indeed at least two specs here: > > > > [1] Feras' <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/streams-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.htm > > > > > > [2] Takeshi's > > < > http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/tyoshino/stream/blob/master/streams.html > > > > > > Among the Qs I have here are ... > > > > * What is the implementation status of these specs? > There's a Blink intent-to-implement for Streams API I sent. I plan to implement it based on [2]. By turning on a flag to turn on experimental features, XHR in Chrome can return a response as a Stream object. It's based on "10. Extension of XMLHttpRequest" of [1]. Nothing done yet for the rest. We're preparing for it (such as implementation of Promises). I agree that we should merge [1] and [2] as Feras said.
