On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joshua Bell <jsb...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Aymeric Vitte <vitteayme...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I am aware of [1], and really waiting for this to be available. >> >> So you are suggesting something like {id:file_id, chunk1:chunk1, >> chunk2:chunk2, etc}? > > No, because you'd still have to fetch, modify, and re-insert the value each > time. Hopefully implementations store blobs by reference so that doesn't > involve huge data copies, at least.
That's what the Gecko implementation does. When reading a Blob from IndexedDB, and then store the same Blob again, that will not copy any of the Blob data, but simply just create another reference to the already existing data. / Jonas