While I haven't finished reviewing it yet, the removal of the dependency on Web Sockets is something we're strongly in favor of. Choosing which protocol the IETF group is going to pursue is a decision to be made there, at least until the Web Push API gains a formal dependency on it.
For the record, I support taking Martin's draft as a base. Thanks, Peter On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Doug Turner <do...@mozilla.com> wrote: > My draft is basically what we do today. Martin's draft leverages > http2 and is much cleaner/simpler. I am not sure which we are putting > our money on yet, but I suspect it will be Martin's. > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Martin, Doug, > > > > I noticed there are two drafts related to push protocol: > > > > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-webpush-http2-00> > > <http://dougt.github.io/webpush-protocol/draft-turner-webpush.html> > > > > What are the plans and expectations for these specs (f.ex. do they > address > > different use case and thus are independent; are they to be merged; is > one > > to replaced/usurped by the other; survival of the fittest; > standardization > > plans; ...)? > > > > -Thanks, ArtB > > > > > >