On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> WHATWG specs are not legitimate for reference by W3C specs. > Do you have a citation to back up this claim? > Their IPR status is indeterminate and they do not follow a consensus > process. > Do you have citations for where this is listed as part of the requirements for references in W3C specifications? I know these are your personal opinions but am not aware of anything that states this is W3C process. - James
