On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you would prefer that the IETF wg charter refer to something else, > please let me know promptly. A small correction is still possible, but the > window is closing. > I think the IETF spec should continue to refer to the latest version published by the Working Group, so no changes are necessary. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/24/14 1:21 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk wrote: > >> The linked working draft is now more than a year old. The latest editor's >> draft has some inconsistencies while we transition to a service worker >> based system, but it's much closer to the current discussions: >> https://w3c.github.io/push-api/ >> > > Thanks for pointing this out Mike. Since the ED uses respec, it's trivial > to prepare a new WD for publication. > > Bryan, Eduardo - given IETF directly refers to the TR version of Push API, > I recommend we publish a new WD for Push API? [1] gets us pretty close and > I can help. OK? I'm strongly in favor of pushing a new working draft. Michael and I will work with Eduardo and Bryan to prepare the current ED for publication late next week. Does that work for you, Arthur? Thanks, Peter
