sounds quite reasonable to me. 12.12.2014, 16:41, "Simon Pieters" <sim...@opera.com>: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:39:47 +0100, Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> What is your counter-proposal? >> Heh. >> >> Fair enough, I guess. :) >> >> These seem related to what Java calls semantic events [JAVADOC], so I'd >> give that a try to see if it fits the model. If not, would "abstract >> events" or simply "high-level events" work? Sorry if these have already >> been discussed and dismissed (haven't had much time to look through the >> archives, tbh). > > How about "device-independent events"? > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software
-- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
