Update below ...
Hi All,
The Web Messaging testing data now shows relatively good
interoperability (see [All],[<2]). However, there are two tests that
have only one pass:
1. <http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/with-ports/026.html>. Only
passes on FF.
2. <http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html>. Only
passes on IE.
I welcome feedback on whether these failures are considered minor/major
implementation bugs, minor/major interoperability problems; that is,
should we propose moving [CR] to Proposed Recommendation with these
failures, or block until there are two or more passes.
-Thanks, AB
[All] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/all.html
[<2] http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/less-than-2.html
[CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-webmessaging-20120501/
On 11/23/14 6:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi Cindy, Kris, All,
Earlier today I ran the webmessaging tests on Chrome, FF, IE and Opera
(12.16) and uploaded the results plus the wptreport files to
[test-results]. The good news is that 104/118 tests (~90%) have 2 or
more passes, however, there are also 14 tests with less than passes.
Do you have some time to look at the [<2] failures? For each of these
failures, it would be helpful to know which ones are actually test
case failures versus implementation bugs, and in the case of impl
bugs, to get a sense of their priority (f.ex. {low,medium,high} impact
on interoperability.
Naturally, we would appreciate help from anyone that is willing to
review these failures.
-Thanks, ArtB
[test-results]
<https://github.com/w3c/test-results/tree/gh-pages/webmessaging>
[<2] <http://w3c.github.io/test-results/webmessaging/less-than-2.html>